Top Social Menu


What Ever Happened to Faculty Governance?

What Ever Happened to Faculty Governance?

Fall 2015

By Jennifer Berkshire, Union News Editor

A provost vetoes a faculty hiring decision. Faculty are notified via memo that a program will now be housed in their department. A meeting of the Faculty Senate is dominated by administrators.

Taken individually, such instances—and the faculty who complain about them—could be seen as “much ado about nothing.” But each is an example of what might be called “administrative creep”: a steady of erosion of faculty decision making in an increasingly top-down climate in which administrators call the shots while keeping an eye on the bottom line.

Nor is this phenomenon unique to UMass Boston or the UMass system. In fact, as a new book documents, the tradition of shared governance on American university campuses is under siege across the country. In The Rise and Decline of Faculty Governance, Larry Gerber, professor emeritus of history at Auburn University, argues that the rise of adjunct faculty and corporate-style management threatens, not just shared governance, but the entire U.S. system of higher education.

“Key questions for the future are whether current challenges to the practice of shared governance will only intensify and whether such challenges will affect the quality and purpose of American higher education,” writes Gerber.

At UMass Boston, economics professor Julie Nelson has watched with dismay as faculty decision making has weakened on campus. A recent case in point: when she and other department members recently learned that a program was to be housed in the Economics Department, the notification came via a memo from an administrator. “We were never consulted about this even though decisions about courses, programs and new schools are supposed to go through the faculty governance process.”

Or take the College of Advancing and Professional Studies, UMass Boston’s fast growing continuing education school. “It exists completely outside of the traditional faculty governance structure,” says Jonathan Chu, a history professor who sits on the Faculty Council. “Without any mechanism for faculty governance, there is really no one looking over the school’s shoulder.”

Nelson, Chu and others say that the solution to the weakening of faculty governance structure is obvious: strengthen such structures. And, thanks to a series of initiatives aimed at making the Faculty Council more responsive to the concerns of faculty members, there are encouraging signs that positive change is underway. Faculty Council Executive Committee member Heike Schotten points to a series of open meetings without any formal agenda (or any administrative presence) at which faculty can tell committee members about their concerns.

Schotten, who is a faculty member in the political science department, says that Faculty Council members also have high hopes that a new investigative committee tasked with looking into autonomy in the hiring process, will transform anecdotes into data. “Faculty have come to us to say that they feel they no longer have autonomy in hiring,” says Schotten.

The new committee, which was approved in October, and whose three faculty members were formerly voted on at the last Faculty Council meeting, will collect data on university hiring during the past five years.

The Faculty Council also approved the creation of another committee: one that will examine the relationship between gender, minority status, service commitments, and the role of these intersecting factors in tenure and promotion. Schotten notes that both committees were created in response to faculty requests and complaints. “There’s a real concern that Faculty Council has been too passive and inactive. We’ve really been working to change that and making the Council more responsive to faculty concerns is an important first step,” says Schotten.

Gerber’s book, The Rise and Decline of Faculty Governance, ends with an urgent appeal to university faculty members across the country. Gerber urges faculty to take up the fight for the future of higher education, and “make the case to the American public that current trends, including the deprofessionalization of the faculty and the retreat from the practices of shared governance, pose a danger to the future well-being of American society.” Without shared governance, writes Gerber, academic rigor and educational quality suffer. ▪

The next open meeting of the Faculty Council will be Nov 30th from 1-3 p.m. in the Ryan Lounge.  The meeting is open to faculty only. Faculty members are urged to come and bring their questions and concerns. 

The FSU will be highlighting faculty governance issues and concerns that you identify in our spring newsletter.  Please send examples of these to us at

FSU Newsletter: